Condensed 6-Traits Rubric

As you know, I use the 6-Traits Rubric to score your papers. Most of you have a packet that describes in detail how to score the paper. We have been using peer edit sheets based off the packet to assess papers in class.


The packet contains a lot of material, so it can be difficult to work with. Recently, Professor Odessa Ogo send me a condensed verion of the Six Traits scoring guide. I will be giving you a hard copy when we do the peer edit for your Comparison and Contrast paper.



This is what the new scoring guide looks like. I hope it will help you to give your peers:


Ideas:

The heart of the message, the content of the
piece, the main theme, with details that enrich and
develop that theme


5: This paper is clear and focused. It holds the reader's
attention. Relevant anecdotes and details enrich the central
theme.


A. The topic is narrow and manageable.
B. Relevant, telling, quality details go beyond the obvious.
C. Reasonably accurate details.
D. Writing from knowledge or experience; ideas are fresh
and original
E. Reader's questions are anticipated and answered.
F. Insight

3: The writer is beginning to define the topic, even though
development is still basic or general.


A. The topic is fairly broad.
B. Support is attempted.
C. Ideas are reasonably clear.
D. Writer has difficulty going from general observations to
specifics.
E. The reader is left with questions.
F. The writer generally stays on topic.

1: The paper has no clear sense of purpose or central
theme. The reader must make inferences based on sketchy
or missing details.


A. The writer is still in search of a topic.
B. Information is limited or unclear or the length is not
adequate for development.
C. The idea is a simple restatement or a simple answer to
the question.
D. The writer has not begun to define the topic.
E. Everything seems as important as everything else.
F. The text may be repetitious, disconnected, and contains
too many random thoughts


Key Question: Did the writer stay focused and share
original and fresh information or perspective about the topic?



Organization:

The internal structure, the thread of
central meaning, the logical and sometimes intriguing
pattern of the ideas.


5: The organizational structure of this paper enhances and
showcases the central idea or theme of the paper;
includes a satisfying introduction and conclusion.

A. An inviting introduction draws the reader in; a satisfying
conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and
resolution.
B. Thoughtful transitions
C. Sequencing is logical and effective
D. Pacing is well controlled.
E. The title, if desired, is original.
F. Flows so smoothly, the reader hardly thinks about it

3: The organizational structure is strong enough to move
the reader through the text without too much confusion.

A. The paper has a recognizable introduction and
conclusion.
B. Transitions often work well.
C. Sequencing shows some logic, yet structure takes
attention away from the content.
D. Pacing is fairly well controlled.
E. A title (if desired) is present.
F. Organization sometimes supports the main point or story
line.

1: The writing lacks a clear sense of direction.

A. No real lead.
B. Connections between ideas are confusing.
C. Sequencing needs work.
D. Pacing feels awkward.
E. No title is present (if requested).
F. Problems with organization make it hard for the reader
to get a grip on the main point or story line.


Key Question: Does the organizational structure enhance
the ideas and make it easier to understand?


Voice:

The unique perspective of the writer evident in
the piece through the use of compelling ideas, engaging
language, and revealing details.


5: The writer of this paper speaks directly to the reader in a
manner that is individual, compelling, engaging, and shows
respect for the audience.


A. Uses topic, details, and language to strongly connect
with the audience.
B. Purpose is reflected by content and arrangement of
ideas.
C. The writer takes a risk with revealing details.
D. Expository or persuasive reflects understanding and
commitment to topic.
E. Narrative writing is honest, personal, and engaging.

3: The writer seems sincere, but not fully engaged or
involved. The result is pleasant or even personable, but not
compelling.


A. Attempt to connect with audience is earnest but
impersonal.
B. Attempts to include content and structure to reflect
purpose.
C. Occasionally reveals personal details, but avoids risk.
D. Expository or persuasive writing lacks consistent
engagement with the topic.
E. Narrative writing reflects limited individual perspective.


1: The writer seems uninvolved with the topic and the
audience.

A. Fails to connect with the audience.
B. Purpose is unclear.
C. Writing is risk free, with no sense of the writer.
D. Expository or persuasive writing is mechanical, showing
no engagement with the topic.
E. Narrative writing lacks development of a point of view.


Key Question: Would you keep reading this piece if it were
longer?


Word Choice:

The use of rich, colorful,
precise language that moves and enlightens the reader.

5: Words convey the intended message in a precise,
interesting, and natural way.
A. Words are specific and accurate.
B. Striking words and phrases.
C. Natural, effective and appropriate language.
D. Lively verbs, specific nouns and modifiers.
E. Language enhances and clarifies meaning.
F. Precision is obvious.

3: The language is functional, even if it lacks much energy.

A. Words are adequate and correct in a general sense.
B. Familiar words and phrases communicate.
C. Attempts at colorful language.
D. Passive verbs, everyday nouns, mundane modifiers
E. Functional, with one or two fine moments.
F. Occasionally, the words show refinement and precision.

1: The writer struggles with a limited vocabulary

A. Words are nonspecific or distracting.
B. Many of the words don’t work.
C. Language is used incorrectly.
D. Limited vocabulary, misuse of parts of speech.
E. Words and phrases are unimaginative and lifeless.
F. Jargon or clichés, persistent redundancy.

Key Question: Do the words and phrases create vivid
pictures and linger in your mind?


Sentence Fluency:

The rhythm and flow of the
language, the sound of word patterns, the way in which
the writing plays to the ear, not just to the eye.


5: The writing has an easy flow, rhythm and cadence.

Sentences are well built.
A. Sentences enhance the meaning.
B. Sentences vary in length as well as structure.
C. Purposeful and varied sentence beginnings.
D. Creative and appropriate connectives.
E. The writing has cadence.

3: The text hums along with a steady beat, but tends to be
more pleasant or businesslike than musical.

A. Sentences get the job done in a routine fashion.
B. Sentences are usually constructed correctly.
C. Sentence beginnings are not ALL alike; some variety is
attempted.
D. The reader sometimes has to hunt for clues.
E. Parts of the text invite expressive oral reading; others
may be stiff, awkward, choppy, or gangly.


The reader has to practice quite a bit in order to give this
paper a fair interpretive reading.

A. Sentences are choppy, incomplete, rambling, or
awkward. Phrasing does not sound natural.
B. No "sentence sense" present.
C. Sentences begin the same way.
D. Endless connectives.
E. Does not invite expressive oral reading.


Key Question: Can you FEEL the words and phrases flow
together as you read it aloud?


Conventions:

The mechanical correctness of the
piece; spelling, grammar and usage, paragraphing, use
of capitals, and punctuation.

5: The writer demonstrates a good grasp of standard
writing conventions (e.g., spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, grammar, usage, paragraphing)

A. Spelling is generally correct.
B. Punctuation is accurate.
C. Capitalization skills are present.
D. Grammar and usage are correct.
E. Paragraphing tends to be sound.
F. The writer may manipulate conventions for stylistic
effect; and it works!

3: The writer shows reasonable control over a limited range
of standard writing conventions

A. Spelling is usually correct or reasonably phonetic on
common words.
B. End punctuation is usually correct.
C. Most words are capitalized correctly.
D. Problems with grammar and usage are not serious.
E. Paragraphing is attempted.
F. Moderate (a little of this, a little of that) editing.

1: Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and
grammar and/or paragraphing repeatedly distract the
reader and make text difficult to read.


A. Spelling errors are frequent.
B. Punctuation missing or incorrect.
C. Capitalization is random.
D. Errors in grammar or usage are very noticeable.
E. Paragraphing is missing.
F. The reader must read once to decode, then again for
meaning.


Key Question: How much editing would have to be done to
be ready to share with an outside source?
· A whole lot? Score in the 1-2 range.
· A moderate amount? Score in the 3 range.
· Very little? Score in the 4-5 range.